Document Zim culture
Lazarus Sauti
|
Most of it remains
unrecorded as it continues to be passed from generation to generation. This
proves that Zimbabwe shows little care on its cultural heritage. In his
research work titled “Value of documenting African knowledge”, Collence Chisita
mourned the failure to document Zimbabwean culture to “lack of appreciation and
a total disorientation of the mind resulting in some kind of intellectual
inertia on the part of intellectuals amongst Zimbabweans.”
Chisita writes:
“Development can only take place if Zimbabweans stand on their own platforms,
appreciating and using their own cultural (indigenous knowledge) systems and
putting on cultural costumes to demystify science and technology.
“Zimbabwe is endowed with
a wealth of indigenous knowledge but access to such knowledge is hampered by
lack of an environment that permits free flow of cultural ideas among members
of the community.”
It is sad to note that
not much is being done by Zimbabwe to document its traditional knowledge.
Failure to document this culture is a result of colonial hangover. It can also
be accredited to total confusion of the mind ensuing in some kind of
intellectual inactivity on the part of the intellectuals.
Chisita says, “The
failure to accept Zimbabwean culture can be attributed to colonialism and the
Christian crusade in the name of Christianity, commerce and civilisation sought
to acculturate the conquered in a bid to establish firm control over them.”
However, appreciating and
documenting the country’s culture enhances the preservation and restoration of
our history for the future.
Munyaradzi Shoko, an
information officer, says recording Zimbabwean culture helps to increase
international awareness of Zimbabwean heritage and creates an accurate record
of important sites for restoration and conservation purposes.
Shoko said: “Documenting
the country’s cultures preserves our history and the data can be used for
conservation, restoration, research and education. The main intention should be
to provide data for the future, should cultural sites deteriorate or be
destroyed.”
Ultimately, documenting
Zimbabwean culture reconnects Zimbabweans with their cultural heritage and
brings back life to some of the traditions or practices of our ancestors since
the best hope for preservation of Zimbabwe’s culture lies in those who
constitute the cultures.
More so, preserving Zimbabwean culture is the only possible panacea for the negative effects of globalisation — the ability of many people, ideas and technology to move from one country to another.
More so, preserving Zimbabwean culture is the only possible panacea for the negative effects of globalisation — the ability of many people, ideas and technology to move from one country to another.
This implicates
globalisation as oriented to achieving universalisation, homogenisation,
integration and centralisation: factors which foretell danger to the cultural
and linguistic identity of most of the peoples of the world, especially the
Zimbabweans.
In fact, the benefits advanced by the proponents of globalisation make this danger difficult to be observed.
In fact, the benefits advanced by the proponents of globalisation make this danger difficult to be observed.
In his book “A Fine
Madness”, Mashingaidze Gomo states that globalisation can be interpreted as
neo-colonialism.
He said, “Globalisation
is a system with socio-economic cover equipped to destroy the remnants of
African cultural and linguistic identity left by colonialism.”
According to Gomo, the only workable way of preserving the bits and pieces of Zimbabwean cultural and linguistic identity is by means of documentation of our cultures and languages, developed, undeveloped or underdeveloped ones.
According to Gomo, the only workable way of preserving the bits and pieces of Zimbabwean cultural and linguistic identity is by means of documentation of our cultures and languages, developed, undeveloped or underdeveloped ones.
Gomo added: “African
culture and history must be made by Africans who are determined to re-visit the
past to make amends on the present.
“More so to promote and
protect the African dream (African Renaissance), African libraries, archives,
museums and cultural institutions or ministries need to manage their cultural
heritage in such a way that they will become access point to users.
“To do this, these
heritage resources need to be digitalised for better preservation.”
The purpose of preserving anything is to enable access to it in future. Without access to Zimbabwean cultural heritage it would be difficult for people to learn from the past successes and failures.
The purpose of preserving anything is to enable access to it in future. Without access to Zimbabwean cultural heritage it would be difficult for people to learn from the past successes and failures.
Munyaradzi Shoko said:
“Library and information professionals in Zimbabwe should have the task of
repackaging the cultural heritage in order to meet international standards.
“This is so because
survival in the new global business market calls for improved productivity and
increased competition.”
Libraries and information
professionals should also partner with indigenous communities and must look at
the broad issues involved in the preservation of our cultural heritage. They
must consider Zimbabwean culture not as simply part of a historical archive, but
a contemporary body of relevant knowledge.
Conversely, documenting
the Zimbabwean culture is a daunting task and capital intensive. This is
because it involves special equipment and elaborate local run.
Accordingly, the
government and private organisations should be accessed with a proposal
detailing the benefits of documenting Zimbabwean cultures and soliciting their
contribution in the provision of funds and other logistics that are required in
the documentation process.
Comments
Post a Comment