Bio-piracy on the increase
Lazarus
Sauti
Zimbabwe
is endowed with a rich diversity of life form, and the biodiversity of the
country provides ecosystem services such as food, medicine, energy sources,
building and craft materials as well as spiritual, cultural and aesthetic
services.
Further,
the country’s biodiversity also regulates climate, soil fertility, outbreaks of
pests as well as diseases and maintains functional ecosystems.
This
country’s rich biodiversity, however, is attracting outside interest, a new
kind of overseas visitors who are smuggling out local flora and fauna.
Foreigners,
masquerading as tourists, are on the prowl along the country’s borders,
particularly around major national parks, smuggling the country indigenous
resources.
Recently,
a group of men and women was accosted by officials from the Parks and Wildlife
Authority just outside Gonarezhou National Park after a timely tip-off by
villagers.
Neatly
stashed away in their luggage were four live pangolins, toads, two dead
pythons, five elephant tusks, three black rhino horns, reptiles, three small
tortoises and some unidentified special plant species.
The
loot from the group confirms a growing trend in bio-piracy, the illegal trade
in wildlife species.
Sadly,
foreigners are benefiting at the expense of locals who live in the country’s
biodiversity hot spots.
In
fact, ‘they are stealing the loaf and sharing the crumbs’, to borrow from Dr
Tewolde Berhan Egziabher, an advocate and defender of community and
environmental rights in Africa.
“Bio-piracy,
the theft of biological matter like plants, seed and genes, and estimated to be
the world’s third biggest criminal activity, after arms and drug smuggling, is
fast becoming a cancer that is ravaging Zimbabwe and other southern African
states,” said Peace Sibanda, an environmentalist.
The
International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), an international
organisation working in the field of nature conservation and sustainable use of
natural resources, vindicated Sibanda’s statement.
“One
species, the succulent hoodia cactus, found in the southern Africa region, a
special root used for centuries by the Basarwa or Bushmen, to cure wounds and
intestinal disorders is under threat from bio-piracy,” said the IUCN.
Lack
of financial resources as well as effective laws regulating the usage of the
country’s natural resources by the government, adds Sibanda, has contributed to
this flourishing illegal trade in wild animals and plants.
“In
the absence of laws, Zimbabwe stands to lose out on indigenous knowledge of
native flora. The governments, therefore, needs to join hands with civic
organisations and other generous partners to craft and adopt effective law and
to increase resources for operations for national parks along the country’s
borders to curb bio-piracy,” he said.
The
government adds Cecil Machena, a biodiversity management specialist and
consultant, should also empower local communities to manage natural resources
in their communities.
“One
effective way of ensuring protection of our flora and fauna from smugglers is
to empower local communities. If villagers derive a benefit from their natural
resources as well as indigenous knowledge, they would be keen to protect them,”
he said.
Sharing
the same sentiments, Collence Chisita, a researcher with a keen interest in
indigenous knowledge systems (IKS), adds that to effectively empower locals,
the government should fund research and actively remove stigmatisation
attached, for instance, to local medicines.
He
also said the government, together with relevant stakeholders, should promote
traditional knowledge systems, especially in relation to protection of
medicinal plants, as an avenue to halt bio-piracy, a serious form of ‘colonial
pillaging’.
“Local
communities should benefit from biodiversity – their richest asset, and for
this to happen, the state should ensure that at least half of benefits derived
from commercial use of biological resources are channeled back to the local
community,” he said.
Zimbabwe
Environmental Law Association (ZELA) director, Mutuso Dhliwayo, believes
legislation will provide an acceptable form of access to genetic resources and
associated knowledge by foreign companies and institutes.
“Legislation
also paves the way for equitable sharing of benefits from these resources by local
communities,” said Dhliwayo, adding that “there is need to consolidate
agreements for knowledge-sharing by supplementing them at each stage with more
specific accords and strategies that are adapted to specific cultural contexts
so that local capacities are rewarded and the people involved receive fair
recompense.”
Environmental
Management Agency (EMA) spokesperson, Steady Kangata, also says legislation is
a step in the right direction and as such, he applauded the Parliament of
Zimbabwe for pushing for a Bill on Access to Benefit-Sharing.
“Efforts
to push for a Bill on Access to Benefit-Sharing in Parliament are underway and
will help curtail bio-piracy and unsustainable forest practices,” he said.
To
strengthen its legal push, the government needs to respect the Nagoya Protocol
if the country is to benefit from its flora and fauna. In October 2014, the
United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) implemented the Nagoya
Protocol, an agreement which seeks to ensure that developing nations are fairly
compensated for the use of their flora, fauna and microbes by foreign
scientists.
Comments
Post a Comment