GMOs and food security in SADC
Lazarus Sauti
The first millennium
development goal, as identified by the United Nations, is eradicating extreme
poverty and hunger but countries in the Southern African Development Community
are facing big challenges in attaining this objective.
To conquer this goal,
countries in the regional bloc, as a matter of necessity, need to achieve
sustainable food security – a scenario where all people at all times have
physical and economic access to adequate amounts of nutritious, safe, and
culturally appropriate foods, which are produced in an environmentally
sustainable and socially just manner.
Some people see
genetically modified crops, as playing a big role in reaching this
all-important goal of eradicating poverty and hunger.
Genetic modification is
the technology that employs genetic material from unrelated organisms and
injects them into another organism (plant or animal), to confer the recipient
organism new and desirable features such as higher yield, pest resistance, and
drought tolerance.
According to the
International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications (2013)
report, only one SADC member state – South Africa (ranked 8th) – conversely, is
among top 28 international GMOs producers in the world.
The fact that Southern
Africa has only one member state as one of the top GMO producers in the
universe shows that there is either a lack of consensus or political will when
it comes to embracing GMOs in the region.
This is, however,
understandable because the universe is divided into two parties when it comes
to GMOs.
“One party is against
the extensive use of GMOs and it is led by the European Union. It prefers
organic matter and perceives it to be healthier, and is of the firm belief that
GMOs do more harm than good.
“The second party,
headed by the United States of America, is supportive in using GMOs widely as
it argues that GMOs have no proven risks and hence, there is no harm in using
them,” says Sameh Soror, an expert in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Adding on, scientific
institutions, government regulators and other stakeholders in Southern Africa
lack the expertise to support decision making on the relevance and
applicability of new biotechnologies, particularly genetically modified
agricultural crops that contribute to increased agricultural productivity and
ensure access to safe food.
This is so because as
debate around GMOs continues, with conflicting viewpoints and legislation
emanating from different SADC countries.
In Zimbabwe, for
instance, Parliament recently grilled Agriculture, Mechanisation and Irrigation
Development Permanent Secretary, Ringson Chitsiko, over government’s refusal to
adopt genetically modified organisms and BT Cotton production.
Chitsiko told the joint
Portfolio Committee on Lands and Agriculture and the Thematic Committee on
Millennium Development Goals that the government was being cautious on policies
to allow GMOs and BT Cotton because there was need for further research on
their repercussions.
Legislator Samuel
Sipepa Nkomo, however, said government’s rigidity was uncalled as scientists
from the country had proved GMOs were harmless.
“Farmers are abandoning
cotton because of prudence in policies by government, and who will die in
Zimbabwe for using BT cotton? Why are you so rigid to the extent you are not
even allowing trials. You should allow for stakeholder discussions over the
issue so that Zimbabweans decide on what they want.”
Another legislator,
Remigious Matangira, added: “We are already eating imported cooking oil from BT
cotton seed from South Africa, and cattle are also eating BT cotton cake and
why the rigidity?”
Chitsiko, nevertheless,
maintained countries that had adopted GMOs were now regretting the move, but
Members of Parliament could not have it, saying the government should allow for
research and dialogue on the issue.
Agricultural
researcher, Adeeba Khairun, agrees there are some aspects to GMOs that require
more research, and only after that can it be deemed appropriate or
inappropriate.
Accordingly, as recommended
by the SADC Advisory Committee on Biotechnology and Biosafety in 2003, the
regional bloc should encourage member states to commission studies on the
implications of biotechnology and biosafety on agriculture, environment, health
and socioeconomics as part of an integrated monitoring and evaluation system.
More so, the region
needs support to strengthen the capacity of scientists, government regulators
and policy makers in biosafety and biotechnology so as to increase food
security as well as eradicating extreme poverty and hunger.
Honestly, the adoption
of GMOs is not the only way to realise food security but is one option that
should be explored carefully to transform the economies of SADC member states.
Consequently, countries
within and across the regional bloc cannot afford to ignore GMOs as a possible
option for improving food security.
Comments
Post a Comment